May 08, 2013

Facebook's 'Babies' page causes mass confusion

Today, I've actually been on Facebook! (Read my thoughts on Social Networking in 2013)

Earlier this afternoon, I noticed a friend post a message about someone adding photos of her children to a Facebook page without her authorisation. This was followed by several other friends posting almost the same thing.

Immediately, I went to the page to discover an automatically generated page titled Babies. This page shows some information from the wikipedia article for Babies, along with a very informative section that reads:
This Page is automatically generated based on what Facebook users are interested in, and not affiliated with or endorsed by anyone associated with the topic.

As well as the huge amount of people that have 'liked' the page (currently 333,000), there has been a large amount of people posting about the page, and spreading it.

The issue people have is about the pictures that are contained on the page. These pictures are actually pictures that have been shared with the viewer and that contain the text 'Baby' or 'Babies' in the caption. It seems most people don't realise that.

I've received messages stating that people are reporting seeing pictures they shouldn't be able to see (people they don't know), and even reports that a pervert / pedophile is stealing photos and posting them. This is not true.
Even if it the report about seeing pictures they shouldn't be able to see was true, you'd have to realise that many people choose to make their posts / pictures public.

When I viewed the page from a desktop computer, it also contained a link to a Malaysian movie, which informs you that the screenwriter's name is 'Baby'.

Lastly, for those of you that insist you haven't given Facebook permission to use the photo on a page, you need to realise that this is no different to seeing a friends picture on 'your' news feed. Yes, the news feed is also really just a generated page on Facebook's website.

Needless to say, don't worry about it! Your pictures of your children are as safe as they were yesterday.

Please feel free to share this post to those on Facebook, especially to those who are sharing the babies page or are concerned.

Jetstar Customer Service - Incompetent & Insensitive

I'd bought my mother and father-in-law a return trip to the Gold Coast in Queensland, Australia as a present for their 40th wedding anniversary flying Jetstar. Unfortunately, my father-in-law passed away on the 6th April, 2013 - the very day before their 40th wedding anniversary.

During the following week, I called Jetstar to inform them that the passengers were no longer able to travel, and they told me that they can either send me a very limited Jetstar travel voucher for the cost of the fares, or I'd have to fill out their compassionate request form if I'd like a refund or change of flight details (including name change) which requires 'supporting documentation' such as a funeral home statement or a copy of the deceased's death certificate.

Once I was able to obtain a copy of my father-in-law's death certificate, I filled out Jetstar's compassionate request form and waited for a reply.

On the 25th April at 4:00AM, I received an e-mail notifying me that the flight schedule had been changed. This was the only correspondance I had received from Jetstar by the end of April, so I called them again and was informed that the compassionate request form had been received and that someone would be in touch with me shortly. The operator seemed to ignore the fact that my mother-in-law was also booked on the flight, and constantly referred to only looking at my father-in-law's flight.

On the 1st May at 3:30AM, I received another email notifying me that the flight schedule had changed, followed by an email at 5:30AM acknowledging a request, with indication that I would be contacted within 5 working days.

I then received a pre-prepared reply on the 4th May at 7:00AM from a no-reply e-mail address as if I had not contacted them before. The email stated that they understand my circumstances might change, and that if I am/was unable to travel on my booking, I should fill out a compassionate request form on their website and include suitable documentation such as medical certificate or documents detailing that a person is deceased. It also indicated that they would consider the request for the possibility of a voucher, which I was offered in the first place (without filling out a compassionate request form). The only part of this e-mail that seemed personalised was the booking reference number and my name, which they'd spelt incorrectly.

On the 7th May at 4:00AM, I was sent ANOTHER (third) notice that the flight schedule had changed.
Whilst looking on Jetstar's website, a box came up allowing me to chat (online) with a customer service agent. I thought this might be a great idea, so I clicked the button and had a conversion with Gerald:


[15:31:29] Info: Thank you for choosing Jetstar. A Travel Specialist will be with you shortly.
[15:31:30] Info: You are now chatting with 'Gerald'
[15:31:34] Gerald: Hello! My name is Gerald. How may I assist you today?
[15:31:44] JD: Hi there, I called up after one of my PAX died, was told to send Compassionate Request Form.
[15:32:14] JD: I received no response, so I called to chase it up, I was told that someone would be in touch.
[15:32:33] JD: After waiting nearly a week, I'm told to fill out a compassionate request form.
[15:33:03] JD: Jetstar's customer service is absolutely useless, I just want to speak to someone who can resolve this situation to my satisfaction.
[15:33:04] Gerald: Have you submitted the form?
[15:33:14] JD: Yes.
[15:33:56] JD: After the first time it was requested. When I asked for a follow up on the form, I'm told someone will call me. Instead I get an email directing me to the CRF again!
[15:34:26] JD: I'm sorry if I sound really annoyed (I am) but it's becoming a joke, and costing me money every time I try and reach you guys.
[15:37:23] Gerald: I'm sorry for the inconvenience. May I have the booking reference please?
[15:38:35] JD: Booking Reference # XXXXXX [Removed]
[15:39:15] JD: <Father-in-law's name> passed away on the 6th April, It was planned to be a present for them to receive for their 40th Wedding Anniversary.
[15:40:25] Info: Chat session has ended.


Yes, The operator had effectively 'hung up'. Was I too rude? I'm not sure, but I've now gone from being somewhat annoyed to really annoyed, still with an unresolved issue. I start looking for a customer service policy and find Jetstar's Customer Guarantee which says: "...If you ever need to talk to us about anything, we commit to our customers that our Call Centre will be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year. We also commit that we will have a decision-maker available in our Call Centre to address your query on the call... If we fail to meet this commitment, call us and we’ll provide you with a $50 Jetstar travel voucher". I figure that since they haven't had a decision maker available in the call centre, I'll ask them to honour their customer guarantee and they might get things sorted quicker.

I then proceeded to call Jetstar, and once again explain where I'm up to. After being put on hold a few times, I'm informed that the admin has received my request and the attached document wasn't received. They requested that I re-submit the compassionate request form, I told them I would.

When I asked about the customer guarantee, the operator argued that it is their procedure that the admin must decide on compassionate request forms, and that they can not answer. I asked to speak with the supervisor and was ignored several times, and then I was finally transferred to the supervisor, when I asked his name, the agent told me he didn't know - but he calls him Salva. Salva tells me he is the 'floor support supervisor' and he informs me that he is the most senior agent at the call centre.

I talk to Salva who agree's that they've been unable to make a decision (unless he can call my mother-in-law and see if she's happy to change a booking she didn't end up receiving), however he argues that Jetstar's commitment "is for a query, not a request" and even goes as for to tell me to look the two words up in the dictionary (his English isn't very good as you can see below).
When I ask him for the official reason, and this is (word for word) what he spits out: "The one that you are asking is for the response of the request you have submitted to us, as you can see it will be responded within 15 days. The answer on your request is not yet provided by the admin.". After 2 hours (1:54 minutes to be precise) of being on the phone, Salva indicates that he is going to send a $50 Jetstar travel voucher to me before the phone conversation is ended.

This morning, we receive two emails from Jetstar. The e-mail contain a $50 Jetstar travel vouchers in each. I presumed they had sent a duplicate copy of the first one.
I showed my wife, who starts crying when she notices that Jetstar have issued the travel vouchers in the name of her mother and deceased father, and the vouchers also state "The person named on this Voucher must be a passenger travelling on the booking".


April 25, 2013

JD on Social Networking in 2013

First and foremost, welcome to my new blog.

This first post is about Social Networking and Google+.

When people ask me what Google+ is, I find it hard to explain it quickly to most people without using the term "Facebook". The Google+ fanboys (myself included) might shoot me down for this, but reality is that most people don't understand exactly what social networking is.

My first real experience in what we now call "Social Networking" was probably MySpace. I registered an account on MySpace very early, but only used it to view others' photos. I then joined Twitter, and while I have never been a big 'Tweeter', I do think the service has a use, but a very limited one. I've joined various others such as LinkedIn and FourSquare but I always felt they were popularity contests and something I would not use very frequent, if at all.
After a few years of +Liz Davison asking me to join Facebook, I finally joined in November 2007.

After joining Facebook, I quickly started adding the many family members that were already using Facebook, followed by school friends, and people that I'd met in real life through other people that I was already 'friends' with.
Facebook became a big part of my online identity, even though I kept it rather private for quite some time. It was hard to decide what was appropriate to share as I knew my grandmother, little sister, etc. would be able to read the posts that I had sent for 'friends', therefore I would mostly censor myself. I later changed the idea of censoring myself, to removing the people I was worried about seeing uncensored statuses.

So as you can see, Facebook quickly went from being the place I hated, to the place I loved. I think it mostly worked for me, because almost everyone was there. This is probably also what caused me to start disliking the service.
I always tried to keep my Facebook friends to a limit of about 250 people (half of the 500 friend limit at the time) by removing the people that had become less relevant in my life.
Many people I added on Facebook only used the service every once in a while, so while it might seem like I might get 250 status updates from friends each day, really it was more like 10 status updates from 40 'active' friends. It quickly led me to come to the realisation that many of my friends constantly complained about anything they could - this isn't the circle they have me in in their real lives.

I joined Google+ while it was invite only in July, 2011. Rather than searching for friends in real life, I started adding people that I already knew online such as +Keith Gable, +Brandon Amedee & +Graham Green. I of course invited my wife +Liz Davison and brother +Samuel Davison and probably a few others. Whilst this was working, I already had these people on Facebook, I quickly discovered the Nearby stream (which wasn't very nearby at the time) which allowed me to read and comment on other people's public posts. I also started to notice people talking about me on the now defunct 'incoming' stream. It wasn't until October of 2011 that I really started getting in to Google+. The first person I didn't know who's post I had reshared was +Ben Buxton, and the first person I didn't know who commented on a post of mine was +Mandy Abela.

Google+ quickly became my online identity, and I've met many great people through it.
The only drawback (for me) is that I have been unsuccessful in finding most family and friends on it, with the exception of the very distant +Chris Double of New Zealand, who is my wife's 6th cousin (1x removed), and a few people who have a Google+ profile and don't know/are inactive such as +Jade Beale. The rest of them that I can think of I have invited.

I'm not sure if the lack of everyone is what makes Google+ so great, or if that's what could improve.

As I said, Google+ is now what I consider my online identity, and I have heavily included Google+ in my new blog. What do you think of Google+ or Facebook?